|  | 
	 Halifax Chronicle Herald, Sunday, April 29, 2007Afghanistan and Iraq: the same warby David Orchard and Michael MandelFour years ago, the U.S. and Britain unleashed war on 
						Iraq, a nearly defenceless Third World country barely 
						half the size of Saskatchewan. For 12 years prior to the 
						invasion and occupation, Iraq had endured almost weekly 
						U.S. and British bombing raids and the toughest 
						sanctions in history, the "primary victims" of which, 
						according to the UN Secretary General, were "women and 
						children, the poor and the infirm." According to UNICEF, 
						half a million children died from sanctions-related 
						starvation and disease. Then, in March 2003, the U.S. and Britain, possessors 
						of more weapons of mass destruction than the rest of the 
						world combined, attacked Iraq on a host of fraudulent 
						pretexts, with cruise missiles, napalm, white 
						phosphorous, cluster and bunker-buster bombs, and 
						depleted uranium (DU) munitions. The British medical journal The Lancet 
						published a study last year estimating Iraqi war deaths 
						since 2003 at 655,000, a mind-boggling figure dismissed 
						all too readily by the British and American governments 
						despite widespread scientific approval for its 
						methodology (including the British government's own 
						chief scientific adviser). On April 11, 2007, the Red Cross issued a report 
						entitled "Civilians without Protection: the 
						ever-worsening humanitarian crisis in Iraq." Citing 
						"immense suffering," it calls "urgently" for "respect 
						for international humanitarian law." Andrew White, 
						Anglican Vicar of Baghdad, added, "What we see on our 
						television screens does not demonstrate even one per 
						cent of the reality of the atrocity of Iraq." The UN 
						estimates two million Iraqis have been "internally 
						displaced;" another two million have fled largely to 
						Syria and Jordan, overwhelming local infrastructure. An attack such as that on Iraq, neither in 
						self-defence nor authorized by the United Nations 
						Security Council, is, in the words of the Nuremberg 
						Tribunal that condemned the Nazis, "the supreme 
						international crime." According to the Tribunal's chief 
						prosecutor, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, 
						such a war is simply mass murder. Most Canadians are proud that Canada refused to 
						invade Iraq. But when it comes to Afghanistan, we hear 
						the same jingoistic bluster we heard about Iraq four 
						years ago. As if Iraq and Afghanistan were two separate 
						wars, and Afghanistan is the good war, the legal and 
						just war. In reality, Iraq and Afghanistan are the same 
						war. That's how the Bush administration has seen 
						Afghanistan from the start; not as a defensive response 
						to 9-11, but the opening for regime change in Iraq (as 
						documented in Richard A. Clarke's Against all Enemies). 
						That's why the Security Council resolutions of September 
						2001 never mention Afghanistan, much less authorize an 
						attack on it. That's why the attack on Afghanistan was 
						also a supreme international crime, which killed at 
						least 20,000 innocent civilians in its first six months. 
						The Bush administration used 9-11 as a pretext to launch 
						an open-ended so-called "war on terror," in reality, a 
						war of terror because it kills hundreds of times more 
						civilians than the other terrorists do. That the Karzai regime was subsequently set up under 
						UN auspices doesn't absolve the participants in Americas 
						war, and that includes Canada. Nor should the fact that 
						Canada now operates under the UN authorized 
						International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) mislead 
						anyone. From the start, ISAF put itself at the service 
						of the American operation, declaring "the United States 
						Central Command will have authority over the 
						International Security Assistance Force" (UNSC Document 
						S/2001/1217). When NATO took charge of ISAF, that didn't 
						change anything. NATO forces are always ultimately under 
						U.S. command. The "Supreme Commander" is always an 
						American general, who answers to the U.S. president. Canadian troops in Afghanistan not only take orders 
						from the Americans, they help free up more U.S. forces 
						to continue their bloody occupation of Iraq. When the U.S. devastated Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia 
						(1961-1975), leaving behind six million dead or maimed, 
						Canada refused to participate. But today Canada has 
						become part of a U.S. war being waged not only in Iraq 
						and Afghanistan, but also in a network of disclosed and 
						undisclosed centres of physical and mental torture, like 
						Guantanamo Bay in illegally occupied Cuban territory. 
						What we know about what the U.S. government calls 
						terrorism is that it is largely a response to foreign 
						occupation; and what we know about American occupation 
						is that it is a way the rich world forces the rest to 
						surrender their resources. General Rick Hillier bragged that Canada was going to 
						root out the "scumbags" in Afghanistan. He didn't 
						mention that the Soviets, using over 600,000 troops and 
						billions in aid over 10 years, were unable to control 
						Afghanistan. Britain, at the height of its imperial 
						power, tried twice and failed. Now, Canada is helping 
						another fading empire attempt to impose its will on 
						Afghanistan. Canadians have traditionally been able to hold their 
						heads high when they travel the world. We did not 
						achieve that reputation by waging war against the 
						world's poor; in large part, we achieved it by refusing 
						to do so. Canada must immediately, and at the minimum open its 
						doors to Iraqis and Afghans attempting to flee the 
						horror being inflicted on their homelands. We must stop 
						pretending that we're not implicated in their suffering 
						under the bombs, death squads and torture. This means 
						refusing to lend our name, our strength and the blood of 
						our youth in this war without end against the Third 
						World. 
 David Orchard is the author of The Fight for 
						Canada: Four Centuries of Resistance to American 
						Expansionism and ran twice for the leadership of the 
						Progressive Conservative party. He farms at Borden, SK 
						and can be reached at tel 306-652-7095,
						
						davidorchard@sasktel.net,
						
						www.davidorchard.com. Michael Mandel is Professor of International Law at 
						York Universitys Osgoode Hall Law School in Toronto and 
						author of 
						
						How America Gets Away With Murder: Illegal Wars, 
						Collateral Damage and Crimes Against Humanity. 
						He can be reached at tel 416-736-5039,
						
						MMandel@osgoode.yorku.ca. 
						Back 
               Top |