eye magazine (Toronto), Sunday, 1 July, 1993
Selling out the nation
Three new books investigate the
impact of Mulroney, the United States and free trade
By Scott Anderson
As Canadians gear up for another federal election,
publishing houses have been busy filling the market with
political and economic literature in order to quench the
public's thirst for knowledge on the campaign-defining
issues.
Over the past month a number of books have been
piling up at eye and publicists have been tracking down
this reporter in hopes of favourable plugs. Pre-election
reads are interesting if for no other reason than you
get the entire demoralizing government record put into
one handsomely bound, easy-to-read volume. You also get
politicians bent on increasing their stature through the
printed page.
Last year, during the elections in the United States,
the bookstore shelves were crowded with the ramblings of
politicians who were looking to lend some intellectual
weight to their populist diatribes. Texas billionaire
Ross Perot published a bestselling no-brainer, Tennessee
senator Al Gore wrote a points-getter on the environment
and even former presidential candidate Paul Tsongas
scribbled a book about his plan for fiscal
responsibility. Suddenly, every politician in the U.S.
was a brooding, philosophical Thomas Jefferson. (Of
course there has already been a spillover in Canadian
politics. Both Garth Turner and Patrick Boyer displayed
their books at the Tory leadership convention earlier
this month.)
However, there were books published last year that
were outstanding commentaries on the United States'
domestic woes. William Greider's book, Who Will Tell the
People: The Betrayal of American Democracy (Simon and
Schuster, $16.95 paper), is a revealing glimpse into
power structures in Washington that have undermined the
democratic process. And two Philadelphia Inquirer
reporters, Donald L. Barlett and James B. Steele,
published America: What Went Wrong? (Andrews and McMeel,
$6.95 paper), an expansion of their newspaper series
that exposed the increasing social and economic
polarization between America's rich and poor.
In Canada, a number of books have been published
recently that offer a wide variety of insights into the
policies that have shaped the social and economic
landscape of the past eight years. Most of these works
focus on the United States' encroaching sphere of
influence in this country, as represented chiefly by the
Free Trade Agreement (FTA).
That Brian Mulroney has succumbed to the U.S. more
than any other prime minister in the history of Canada
is what Lawrence Martin, a former Globe and Mail
staffer, argues in Pledge of Allegiance: The
Americanization of Canada in the Mulroney Years (McLelland
and Stewart, $29.99 cloth). He writes that Canada has
become "increasingly isolated and bound to a shrinking
and — as measured against the glories of its psot-war
supremacy — declining American empire."
Even though Canadians went to the polls four years
ago on the issue of a bilateral tarde deal, many
Canadians are still not convinced it has worked to their
advantage. In What Canadians Believe, But Shouldn't
About Their Economy: 26 economic Myths (Addison-Wesley,
$16.95 paper), economist Patrick Luciani argues that it
is too early to tell whether Canada has gained from the
FTA. However, he does put forward that "the more
credible data tends to suggest that so far the gains are
positive but small." The reason people felt "had" by the
Americans and the Mulroney government was because of
"politics rather than economics and in what people saw
the agreement to be in the first place."
He argues that another reason for Canadians' negative
perceptions about the agreement "is that the FTA came
into effect just before the country entered the 1990
recession and it was inevitable that opponents of the
agreement would confuse the hardships of the recession
with the signing of the free trade agreement."
Yet Martin doesn't agree. In Pledge of Allegiance he
writes: "In the long term, after the shakedown, after
the Canadian economy was rationalized to continental
standards, the legacy of free trade would perhaps be
different. But in the short term it was impossible to
explain the staggering failures in Canada's
manufacturing sector in the context of the recession
alone. Free Trade bore responsibility. No other
recession-hit country was losing factory jobs at the
same rate as Canada."
Probably the most scathing indictment of the Mulroney
agenda and the FTA comes from David Orchard, national
chairman of Citizens Concerned About Free Trade, in The
Fight for Canada: Four Centuries of Resistance to
American Expansionism (Stoddart, $17.95 paper). If you
read one book before the general election, make it this
one. Orchard has done an excellent job of chronicling
Canada's historical struggle to maintain its sovereignty
in the face of unrelenting U.S. expansionism and
domination.
The book focuses on the pivotal moments, from the
continental wars between British North America and the
U.S. through the subtler present conflicts. Orchard
feels that Canada, which the U.S. has always coveted but
failed to acquire through forceful means, may be won
finally through economic domination.
"Because most Canadians did not have access to either
the FTA or the documents necessary to make sense of it,
the government was able to exploit the public hunger for
information," he writes. "More than $25 million of
public money was spent producing and circulating
booklets, pamphlets and materials like the Synopsis, The
FTA in Brief and other articles of a similar nature."
While Luciani argues in favour of free trade based on
the economist's ideal of "comparative advantage,"
Orchard shoots the theory down. "The myth is
‘competitiveness,' because a foreign-owned branch-plant
economy cannot compete with its foreign owners," he
writes.
The next election will be a turning point for Canada.
With the rise of prominent regional political parties it
may be difficult for any one party to win a clear
majority and implement a mandate. There is a lot of
information out there, aside from the daily snapshots in
the media, that can assist Canadians in making an
informed vote.
Back
Top |